Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In life, people come across various circumstances where they need to make a prudent decision. In order to decide they take the help of different sources such as - Internet, friends and family’s advice, their own intuitions, past experiences, etc. The prompt states that having the knowledge of the past is not helpful in making crucial decisions in today’s time. However, I mostly disagree with the statement for two reasons.
To begin, there are numerous occasions in the past which tell us about the behaviour of people in different scenarios and how it changes for their own protection or desires. For example, news reports suggesting a burglary in a house caused by a family member to cater his personal desires. Likewise, the kingsguard killed his own king by accepting the enemy’s lucrative offer. Such stories tell us that before trusting anyone, even our trustworthy members, people should be aware of the risks and to take necessary precautions. Otherwise, malign consequences shall be faced.
Further, past mistakes help in getting an idea about how one must be wary in making present decisions. These mistakes might be less likely to happen in current times but at least they give a perspective as to how previous carelessness gave them harmful consequences. Take, for example, unpreparedness for heavy flooding causing detrimental consequences to the city. This shows how previous unpreparedness will help the government to take precautionary measures for future disasters. Thus, people must do a careful risk analysis wherein the past mistakes would foster future preparedness.
Finally, previous research and innovations are the basis for future enhancements in technology. They are the roots on which the current developments are taking place. For instance, the creation of wheels in the stone age led to the invention of handcarts which acted as the base to inventing motor vehicles. Currently these vehicles are being researched to create self-driving cars. All these facts provide substantial evidence that historical facts and research are our mentor to current advancements.
Hence, although the past's success cannot guarantee present decisions to be successful, it certainly helps people make smarter decisions. Like, in stock marketing, the historical data can tell us how unpredictable a particular stock price can be to determine and how exceedingly vary in minute differences also. This would help people be prepared and take careful decisions and also know how much risk people must take so that the failure is not extreme. Hence, in conclusion, the past experiences make people be aware that anything is possible, they become the base on which future decisions can be made and also how much people can be trusted in different situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | kalp98403 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | idris oriyomi | 58 | view |
| 2022-05-12 | Millan | 50 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 83
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 58
- The best test of an argument is the argument s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...nd, technology, etc., everything has it own evolution and it is important to to the...
^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...as it own evolution and it is important to to these changes for referential purposes....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...e a larger amount of population are now follow many strict policies and green technolo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solvin...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and then'?
Suggestion: and then
...he technology are encountered every now an then. This can change the way of solving a p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3049.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 623.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89406099518 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99599519102 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68347130005 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478330658106 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 952.2 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3128948847 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.892857143 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179531139898 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587825599353 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479930655519 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10886936242 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065626145824 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.