The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These combined charts illustrate economically exporting growths during 2015-1016 and fluctuation in percentage of 2016 compared to 2015.
It is apparent that the bar graph gave unspecific figures. At the beginning of analyzing, almost all products have moderately increased in two years period. otherwise, the table clearly shown and also indicated enormously amazing development of textiles in specific rates and the drawback in Agricultural earnings.
Obviously, in the first chart, Petroleum and Engineers goods take the highest portions in both 2015 and 2016, always gained approximately 57 percent and more. In the meantime, textiles and Agricultural are the lowest areas with 32 and merely 25 percent in 2015 comparing the graph and simultaneously achieved roughly 32 percent in 2016. The rest is Gems and jewelry turnover accomplished more or less 42,5 percent, higher considering the prospective time.
As mentioned, in the table, textile accounts for extremely high growth, exactly 15,24 percent while Agricultural merchandise just grows at 0,81 percent, the slowest one. Additionally, both Petroleum and engineers goods are also increased (3 and 8,5 percent) following relevant numbers In contrast, valuable accessories have dramatically negative inclination (5,18%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Give your opinion and discuss this issue 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...derately increased in two years period. otherwise, the table clearly shown and also indic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ounts for extremely high growth, exactly 15,24 percent while Agricultural merchan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83957219251 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06635884235 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700534759358 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.356742518 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159594300447 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644764047734 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999011353522 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11671772832 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124755129969 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...derately increased in two years period. otherwise, the table clearly shown and also indic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ounts for extremely high growth, exactly 15,24 percent while Agricultural merchan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83957219251 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06635884235 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700534759358 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.356742518 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159594300447 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644764047734 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999011353522 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11671772832 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124755129969 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.