Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people go to university for academic study. More people should
be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified
workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

Many people indeed prefer to pursue academic studies at university. But nowadays, many students register to vocational school to get grips with their opportunities easier. I completely agree with that idea to be qualified workers.

Academy isn’t the only way to succeed in life as well as drive society’s progression forward. If coming skilled professions such as plumbers, workers, and permanent maintenance staffs, people can also work for a big company or run their own business. In history, many millionaires dropped out of academic school to conduct a business from zero. Henry Ford began his business when he was 16 and founded a mechanic company. Moreover, the employment issue still causes a lot of hot debate in each country because of the shortage of qualified workers and the surplus of academic employees.

The essential role of workers in the economy is undisputed. This workforce not only participates in the chain of production but also promotes productivity and effectiveness. GDP per person will raise if this country doesn’t have too many unemployed people. Besides, the pressure on academic education will diminish with the proper orientation in school and family. For example, workshops in schools could adopt the theory of the physics lessons to practical applications. Parents should also help their children to choose vocational careers, explaining the good employment prospects.

In conclusion, I agree that it is vital that we encourage more people to do vocational training because, without such skilled workers, society can not function effectively and thrive

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-23 Anh Thi 61 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
2024-02-17 honguyenlily 84 view
Essays by user nguyengiakhue :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94577909289 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66935483871 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8348061713 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256009011004 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679380627422 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682330870728 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156983775576 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703231800597 0.056905535591 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94577909289 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66935483871 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8348061713 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256009011004 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679380627422 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682330870728 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156983775576 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703231800597 0.056905535591 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.