Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present-day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make some comparisons where relevant.
The plans depict the development and modernization which has taken place in an art gallery since 2005.
Overall, this gallery has witnessed a wide range of significant changes, the most prominent of which is the rearrangement of the entrance hall and the reception desk at the center of the property. Nevertheless, it is clearly seen that nearly all of the exhibition rooms, apart from the fourth one, remained unrefurbished throughout the time period.
It is also apparent that exhibition room 4 has been flattened to make room for the current interactive children’s area and an adjacent place for the temporary exhibitions. Another refurbishment worth noticing is the demolishment of the gallery office and the installation of new vending machines. Furthermore, the café and shop area has been converted into a gallery shop.
There are also exponential changes to the stairways inside and outside of the gallery. On the outside, this has been halved with an intention of placing a new wheelchair ramp. On the inside, at the end of the gallery, next to exhibition room 3, a lift has been added; therefore, the stair leading up to the upper floor has been made smaller.
- Some people think that outdoor activities bring beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many young people change their jobs and careers What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...theless, it is clearly seen that nearly all of the exhibition rooms, apart from the fourth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00155838647 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2283613278 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0892992082375 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036181977069 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046126987079 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636179630504 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573611114844 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.