The passage and lecture are both talking about a story of using burning mirror by Roman to attack Greek ships. The auther claims three causes why this story is not real. It is just myth. The lecturer hwoever, casts doub on claim made in article . She mentions, all reason that writer suggests are inconvenience.
First, the passage states, ancient Creeks did not have advance technology to make such device. Mirror should have very precise curvature copper sheet. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She says, ancient people use a many peicec of coppder to make curvature sheet rather than using one large peice.
Second, the auther asserts, burning mirror take lomg time to set the ship on fire. Moreover, this work need immovable shop, which should stay in the same place about ten minuts. The professor refute this notion. She elaborate on other material beside wood that were used by Creek like birck. These material need onlyb second to make ship fire.
Finally, the writer prenteds, Creek people familair with flamimg arrows to shoot on enemy and setting fire in ships. The professor in the other hand suggests, enemy'shipsknow that Creek use arrow, therefor creek used burning mirror to surprise the Room and they did not pay attention to mirror like what happand with flaming arrow.
The passage and lecture are both talking about a story of using burning mirror by Roman to attack Greek ships. The auther claims three causes why this story is not real. It is just myth. The lecturer hwoever, casts doub on claim made in article . She mentions, all reason that writer suggests are inconvenience.
First, the passage states, ancient Creeks did not have advance technology to make such device. Mirror should have very precise curvature copper sheet. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She says, ancient people use a many peicec of coppder to make curvature sheet rather than using one large peice.
Second, the auther asserts, burning mirror take lomg time to set the ship on fire. Moreover, this work need immovable shop, which should stay in the same place about ten minuts. The professor refute this notion. She elaborate on other material beside wood that were used by Creek like birck. These material need onlyb second to make ship fire.
Finally, the writer prenteds, Creek people familair with flamimg arrows to shoot on enemy and setting fire in ships. The professor in the other hand suggests, enemy'shipsknow that Creek use arrow, therefor creek used burning mirror to surprise the Room and they did not pay attention to mirror like what happand with flaming arrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are discussing the possibility of using stars as navigation by humpback whales The author claims there are evidence explain that humpback use stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions these 80
- The passage and lecture are both disscusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments The writer claims three possible uses of these houses The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive First the 70
- TOEFL Next Writing Hide Time25 23 Directions You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationsh 60
- The passage and lecture are about ligalizing of marejuana in USA the reading passage elaborates to three reasons to explain that marejuana should no longer be criminal offense in USA The lecture casts doubt on claim made in article She believes this issue 76
- The reading passage abd lecture are both about existing of bee on earth as early as 200 million years the author claims three evident to support that bee did not exist on earth at that time THe lecturer casts doubt on claim made3 in the article She mentio 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both talking...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ver, casts doub on claim made in article . She mentions, all reason that writer su...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...e place about ten minuts. The professor refute this notion. She elaborate on other mat...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... need onlyb second to make ship fire. Finally, the writer prenteds, Creek peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, moreover, second, so, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00925925926 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22949099201 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5662691253 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.625 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 7.06452816374 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404932537782 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13099888226 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162073419088 0.0662205650399 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263985379415 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.314262306297 0.0443174109184 709% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.