The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table illustrates the amounts of fast food consumption in Melbourne over a period of 20 years between 2005 and 2025.
It is clear that the amounts of all types of convenience food increase over the period shown. Overall, hamburgers are by far the most popular choice for Melbourne consumers.
In 2005, 40 units of Hamburgers were consumed, compared to only 5 units of Salad. Now, people cut their hamburgers consumption by 2 units but Salads are consumed more with 15 units recorded. By 2025, the amount of salads consumed is predicted to continue to jump up by 25 units, becoming the third preferred food while that of Hamburgers is also expected to bounce back by 13.
Some striking differences are not seen in the amounts others. Despite there are some gradual increases in amounts, ranging from 35 to 45 units, Fried Chicken remains to be the second most chosen junk food in every year. Similarly, the figures for fried rice and noodles are equally expected to rise from 6 to only 9 by 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 78
- Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantage 68
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81420765027 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57397351652 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7578336793 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130914363317 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531446369134 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052761158077 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943439931363 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532327627544 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.