Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
After 36 years of constant development, contemporary smartphones encounter striking innovations every quarter. However, along with such technological advancements, many people and media have started to point out their downsides. Regardless of the drawbacks, I believe that smartphones have done more good than harm to our society for two reasons.
First, smartphones have a myriad of applications that provide convenience in everyday life. From calculators to food delivery apps, everything is possible with a smartphone nowadays. For instance, my mom always used to go to the bank when she had to send someone money. However, after the development of banking apps, she does not have to go to the bank anymore. People like my mom have greatly benefited from the development of smartphones. Moreover, it was not even thinkable that one's location could be tracked in real-life in the past. However, this has become possible due to smartphones. Such features are useful, especially to parents, as it is easy to lose their children in a crowded area. The GPS function allows parents to know where their children are, making it easier to find them when they are lost. In this way, smartphones are beneficial and provide convenience to us in different parts of life.
Second, smartphones are significantly helpful in cases of emergency. They are able to aid people that are in danger. For example, I once went to a mountain on a trekking trip with my friends. However, we lost our way in the middle of the mountain. We had no way how to find our way back down. Fortunately, we were able to use our smartphones to ask for help. We called the police, and they did an extensive search to find us. As a result, we were able to get rescued within a few hours. Moreover, smartphones can also help people to evacuate during a disaster. For example, contemporary smartphones have automatic messaging services provided by telecommunication companies that notify people of any natural disaster. This technology comes in great aid to fast evacuation processes and routines, saving millions of lives.
Because of various features of smartphones that support everyday life and save people in danger, smartphones do more good than harm. Although some drawbacks may exist, people have to know that the advantages of smartphones outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-13 | amchoi0810 | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | RAMJI JAISI BHUSAL | 60 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | poojansharma | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Pyae Pyae Aung | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | Pat_mat_345 | 70 | view |
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12041884817 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02078814926 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568062827225 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3675400524 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.2307692308 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195059754456 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508132260129 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684266065821 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145617010638 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681102735373 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.