Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better to be dishonest. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Some people state that it is important sometimes be dishonest because there are some moments in life, if we are not dishonest, we may end up losing opportunities. However, others think otherwise. They believe that it is crucial to be honest at all moments no matter what. In my opinion, being dishonest does not mean that we are robbing things, instead, we need to be dishonest on the contrary we may lose primal information about specific subject. I feel this way as I will talk over in this article.
First of all, being dishonest does not mean that we are stealing something from someone or that we are thieves, instead we have to be dishonest at certain times otherwise we may end up crucial information in life. For example, one of my coworkers at work made a little mistake in using a machinery and as the job was not worth knowing then, I had to be dishonest and lied to our boss about the subject. Yet, this part of the job was a part of training the employees for the real work. Therefore, this example elucidates the desideratum of being dishonest in order no to lose jobs.
Moreover, it may be required, sometimes, to lie in order not to lose friends or girlfriend because we can out of suddenly lose them if we tell the truth about what we have been doing so far. For instance, a few years ago I broke up dating two girls and as I did not want to lose both of them, I had to lie for both at all times, on the contrary I would end up without the two of them. Thus, this instance clarifies the necessity of lying so that not to lose the girlfriends.
Finally, I strongly support the idea of being somehow dishonest because this way we do not end up losing anything, being jobs or girlfriends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | madgal | 70 | view |
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details. 60
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons 55
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money. 11
- Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education or not? Will student sitting at home have more knowledge?ORStudent travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 564, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...desideratum of being dishonest in order no to lose jobs. Moreover, it may be requ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38170347003 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56233378754 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507886435331 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.901683202 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 5.45110844103 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129866634035 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525931132538 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500918920182 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101757995165 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475565807215 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.