Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
It is widely argued that advances in the field of communication have adversely affected people’s personal and professional relationships. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint for some justifications below.
I am convinced that innovations in technology do not exist to the detriment of social relationships, but rather to their benefit. To embark on, as new ways of communicating with one another (such as smartphones or computers) are introduced, some fear that people might become socially isolated as this change may discourage real interaction among people. Nevertheless, this claim is exaggerated. This is because electronic devices have facilitated communication among people regardless of geographical distance. For example, during the current situation of COVID-19 pandemic, the Internet allows people to stay connected with others through various social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc without going out to meet in person.
Equally importantly, I am also of the opinion that not only does advanced communication technology address the problem of distance aforementioned but it also helps to expand social circles. For instance, in earlier times, people used to come to clubs first-hand to meet and exchange with those who share the same taste, which is quite time-consuming and inconvenient. These days, however, people with the same passion can participate in online pages to make friends with those from other places and get to know each other through virtual platforms, which is a salient example of how technology can help promote interaction among people.
By way of conclusion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that social relationships have been jeopardized by the advent of technological breakthroughs in communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | quang31012004 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 67
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 84
- The table describes the percentage of employers difficulty in recruiting employees in fourdifferent fields from 2003 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below depict two different subterranean tunnel systems in two Australian cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...c without going out to meet in person. Equally importantly, I am also of the opinion t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62592592593 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26859143765 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0318877172 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.090909091 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224009530022 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833341398567 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455730895067 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139506211253 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343490811278 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.