The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The table graph elucidates the proportion of mobile phone owners who use different types of mobile phones features in the year between 2006 to 2010.
overall, it can be manifested that the owner has used the highest number of making calls and send receive a text message in the given period. However the least number of used video record and internet in the year 2006.
Firstly the highest number of mobile features had used by the owner which was 100 percent similarly in the year 2006 and 2008. Surprisingly in the year 2010, the 1percent was decreased. whereas, take photos and send receive text messages used by the owner which was approximately 71 to 79percent in the given period, expect in the year 2006 take photos had decreased slightly which was 66percent.
Secondly, the owner had used to play games it was 17 percent in the year 2006 and it increased significantly which was 41to42percent respectively in the year 2008 and 2010. Moreover, in the beginning, year no data can be observed for internet and video record, But in the years 2008 and 2010 internet it was increased dramatically which was 41percent for the former one and it 73 percent for the latter one. Furthermore, for video record, 92 35% increase in the given period. Lastly, play music 12 and 18% respectively in the year 2006, and 2008 it increases moderately which was 26 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | ililmaidatuz | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Shohru_x | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
- The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 67
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
- prevention is better than cure out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rate in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ures in the year between 2006 to 2010. overall, it can be manifested that the owner ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ive a text message in the given period. However the least number of used video record a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... year 2010, the 1percent was decreased. whereas, take photos and send receive text mess...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60853493446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1374206746 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174371441868 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920049204654 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148387170433 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179747359828 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189713862076 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ures in the year between 2006 to 2010. overall, it can be manifested that the owner ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ive a text message in the given period. However the least number of used video record a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... year 2010, the 1percent was decreased. whereas, take photos and send receive text mess...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60853493446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1374206746 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174371441868 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920049204654 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148387170433 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179747359828 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189713862076 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.