In their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their product are new in same way Why is this?
Do you think positive or negative development?
Business firms are establishing updated and recently discovered idea to bloom the economy. Likewise, promotion of previous products by considering them new is done by umpteen of business groups. There are wide range of reasons behind this phenomena. However, it proves destructive progress for the society.
Two predominant reasons come out from this business strategy. firstly, It to benefits to company for growing their product’s sale. To be more precise, when any good as launched in public, then obvious it would be remarkable to grab the attraction of buyer, therefore they purchase products. Resultantly, rising of sales correlate with bombing economic situation. Nextly, it forges to free warehouse of industry because advertisement of already existed products as new invention attributes to sustain monopoly of producers as consumers feel that specific industry manufactures new products. Thus, these false approaches undeniably hurts two people but company takes satisfaction throw selling old stocks.
Alternatively, using method of advertising prolong outputs companies has negative repercussions on society and atmosphere. The manifest drawback maybe seen in terms of environment. For illustration, if it happen, then people follow use and thrown trend due to this rate of garbage uprurges, along with it wide range of problem take birth such as land degradation, land scarcity and so forth. Not only this but also it containment to human and species resources. To epitome, Newspaper “The Hindustan” showed the survey of the sea diver, he said that deepest point of ocean has found plastic particles. What is more, it also puts adverse impact on financial conditions of individuals which is caused by alluring promotions of companies. Consequently, they will be in debt.
In conclusion, although bountiful reasons are stemming to advertise previous products, But it leads to negative development for the environment and society
- Mony peopre use disfonce leoming progroms lo sludy al home but sorne people think thol it connol bring lhe benefrf os rnuch os ollending correge or uniyersiltry To what exfenl do you dgree or disogree 11
- Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduates in particular countries 11
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- Education of young people is a highly prioritised in many countries However educating adults who cannot read and write is even more important and government should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 42
- Many parents choose to think their children at home rather than sending their children to school do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh the drawbacks 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... There are wide range of reasons behind this phenomena. However, it proves destructi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...s come out from this business strategy. firstly, It to benefits to company for growing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...tisement of already existed products as new invention attributes to sustain monopoly of produ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
...of environment. For illustration, if it happen, then people follow use and thrown tren...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, so, then, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63050847458 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03614915085 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68813559322 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5225809044 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157040701793 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409531542804 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445639892274 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915663972312 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260134779966 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.