Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of buying items and advertisement which were always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that purchasing products as per their need is more beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked controversy over the potential impact in recent years. The promotion of products appears to be more rational. This essay will discuss both arguments and will lead to a logical conclusion.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, the most preponderant one stems from the fact that with the promotion of products, people can have a chance to know more about their features and characteristics. In addition, they can able to make the comparisons between legacy items with newer ones. However, if they have added advanced improvements, consumers will show their interests in it. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that advertisements help the businesses attract more customers by showing ads on different platforms such as social media, text messages, by putting banner across the roads. Nowadays, by using advanced technology, they start campaigns online on facebook and instagram where they provide huge discounts on their products so that more they do the sale, the more they earn the profit.
Probing ahead, one of the main underlying reason stems from the fact is that some people prefer to buy items according to their necessities in order to avoid finance burden. Moving further, it is pertinent to mention that when citizens saw an advertisement of any product and attractive price of it, therefore, they tend to purchase it without knowing their benefits and functionality which results in burning a hole in their pocket. Moreover, children are getting attracted towards the publicity things and them pestering and nagging their parents to get that object for them.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach the conclusion that the benefits of product marketing is instrumental indeed as it helps the customers know more about it. Nonetheless, the needs of people should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-17 | awu212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | hoaithuongnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | hoaithuongnguyen | 89 | view |
- The government should invest more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 89
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do so many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 78
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sport while others think it is negative Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the material status of adults Americans in two of the years 11
- Some people think that in the modern society becoming more dependent on each other while others say that individuals are becoming more independent Discuss both views and give Your own opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r the potential impact in recent years. The promotion of products appears to be mor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37685459941 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88509409372 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605341246291 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2466143598 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198236856139 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652308089838 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515289686362 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120169722852 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317108609203 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.