Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the question of how to understand the culture of other places has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that people do not need to travel overseas in order to learn about the culture, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that travelling abroad makes it possible for people to have a deeper understanding of foreign cultures. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that visiting a foreign country enables travellers not only to communicate with local residents but also to mingle with them, leading overseas visitors to acquire real knowledge about local cultures. Furthermore, some materials, including books and films, often present biased information considering that these include the intentions of writers or producers, preventing readers from understanding cultures precisely. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that first-hand experience is much more beneficial for learning about cultures than second-hand experience.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that paying a visit to a foreign nation is the sole way to have a tight grasp of different cultures. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that the development of technology has revolutionised the way people can gain information about the place that they cannot visit regardless of time and place. As an illustration, one notable natural heritage site designated by UNESCO in South Korea that has numerous endangered species of birds prohibited tourists from travelling to that habitat as an astronomical amount of waste produced by travellers posed a threat to the local environment. However, people are capable of obtaining information related to that area owing to the Internet. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | camille1104 | 80 | view |
- Q10 Developments in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinio 89
- Q18 More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information therefore there is no need to print books magazines and newspapers on paper To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Q1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34453781513 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94034401985 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59943977591 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8583849885 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24600812467 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674534285969 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640970566493 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128384198428 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547507727292 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.