Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people think that there will be fewer cars in use than there are today because the cult of buying and driving cars will be decreased in coming years. However, I do not agree and think that in the coming twenty years the number of cars in use will be increased for the following three reasons.
First of all, there will be more sophisticated cars will be produced in the coming twenty years. For example, now in the world, the majority of cars are either petrol or diesel-based. It is likely that the cares in twenty years will be Electricity or Hydrogen based. As the roads available now are much more comfortable than it was in twenty years back, it is possible that incoming twenty years, the roads are even more significantly enhanced and are comfortable. As a result, the tendency to use cars as a means of transportation will be increased. Additionally, it is possible that cars in the future will be driverless. In this case, the people's preference to use cars as their primary means of transportation will be increase.
Second of all, it is likely that cars in the future will be cheaper than today. Retrospective to the past, when I was a kid, those people in the society who used to have cars mostly belong to the rich family. This means, cars in the past used to be expensive compared to the income of the common people. As a result, common people would not afford it. In contrast, now, an ordinary individual with a medium amount of income can easily buy a car. So there are more cars in use today than in the past twenty years. Similarly, I believe in that the coming twenty years, cars will be cheaper than today. Eventually, it will lead to an increase in cars use in the future.
In conclusion, due to the fall in cars price, enhanced roads conditions, use of clean energy, the use of cars in twenty years will be more than there are today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 70
- Many of the world s lesser known languages are being lost as fewer people speak them The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct 79
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 75
- Teacher s salary should be based on their student s academic performance 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...e will be driverless. In this case, the peoples preference to use cars as their primary...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51622418879 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56170191902 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412979351032 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8748752188 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0555555556 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418699873967 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169290504244 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931922272532 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323909324167 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452589867331 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.