People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human beings are the most complex living beings among all, living in the world. The nature of people cannot solely determined either by the factors of their own making or by external factors. The prompt stated that people's behaviour is mostly determined by the external forces rather than the internal(their own making). In my opinion, the issue statement is highly contentious and difficult to choose one over another, therefore, I partly agree with the statement and mostly disagree with it for the following reasons.
Firstly, Human beings' behaviour is so volatile that one cannot determine by examining some of the external factors. People quite often change their mood as the surrounding or the circumstance changes. For instance, when one person is having good profit in his business or he is on the verge of achieving great victory, then, he is more likely to be in a jovial mood: all his activities are positive. However, if the circumstance changes, say, his business reaches the nadir of the loss, it is obvious he will behave in an irked manner. Thus, human beings are volatile and they are determined only by internal factors.
Moreover, the surrounding in which people dwell plays an equal role in the behaviour of the people. And the environment in which people live is not an external factor, rather it is internal. A person, for example, lives in a city where crimes and dishonest events are ubiquitous. If careful observation is made to identify the behaviour of that particular person, it is more possible that they are quite afraid or melancholy. We can determine the nature of his behaviour by studying the factors that are most relevant to his society. We can not only identify the behaviour of the people but also the way he approaches other people. Thus, human behaviour can be identified through the forces of their own making.
However, some people agree with the claim and argue that human conduct can implicitly or sometimes even explicitly determine by external factors, that are common for all human beings. Those people even claim that the complexity of human behaviour can easily be construed by applying external factors like comparing them with other people with the same behaviour or judging them from different angles. In this way, they claim for these reasons.
In conclusion, even though some people claim that the external factors are relevant to find out the nature of a person's behaviour, the internal factors are highly persuasive and compelling in making proper assumptions and it slightly outweighs the former due to the above reasons like examining the environment in which he dwells and by scrutinizing the way he performs his tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-05 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 54
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Y 78
- The chart shows the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- Our school is the best choice for students considering a career in theatre First our school does not require an audition and encourages applicants of all acting experience levels to apply Second our students are trained in all major schools of acting meth 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... the following reasons. Firstly, Human beings behaviour is so volatile that one canno...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... that one cannot determine by examining some of the external factors. People quite often ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...re relevant to find out the nature of a persons behaviour, the internal factors are hig...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02471910112 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6440434541 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456179775281 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8253218325 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152287972692 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542972505066 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421145428074 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957216789176 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455456132526 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.