Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Learning languages is told to be more effective to young children from the age of 5-11 than those whose at the second education level. This essay agrees with that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks. The essay will first demonstrate that the earlier you approach a language, the higher chance you expert in it and people can still understand that even though they haven’t reviewed that for a long time as well as to point out the disadvantages of the way children can be confused by 2 languages is not valid.
The main reason why kids should learn foreign languages at their primary school is due to the fact that it will make them have a longer time to get in touch with those and they will be more likely to talk fluency as they learn those parallel with the mother-tounge one. Therefore, they can talk as a native speaker. For example, in an experiment on students in secondary school, about 70% of the kids that good at pronunciation and listening approached those languages from a very young age. The second advantage of start to learn new language soon is that children can attach them since they were very small so that even when they haven’t studied those for a long period, they still have the ability to understand what people speak that language say. This has been analysed in a Cambridge research that nearly 80% of the adults who haven’t reviewed those languages for years can still hear clearly and write the main point of a random conversation down
However, sometimes kids can be mixed between different languages but there hasn’t been any proves or experiences that pointed out this. For instance, I have been brought up as billigual but I can still speak fluently in both languages with a very lack of mistakes.
In conclusion, the advantages of getting kids start off with the second language at the age below 10 due to the more time they have and it’s in their mind is outweighed the disadvantage of being confused with languages.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children Do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagrams illustrated the process of building an igloo 78
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
... that children have attached them since the they were small so even when they haven’t st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...ime they have and it’s in their mind is outweigh that disadvantage that they will be con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79646017699 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56743273085 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519174041298 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4452222418 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.818181818 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8181818182 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226281775471 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913068851002 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517788412723 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137860640982 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596734757089 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.