In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Recently, in terms of patterns and roles, the family has witnessed significant alterations. From my perspective, these modifications are constructive.
With regards to modifications, families in the present times have undergone two main differences compared to the past. Initially, multi-generation families, which were a prominent feature of the former society, have now been vastly replaced with nuclear families. To be more precise, while extended families, in which several generations live under the same roof, were popular in the earlier time, conjugal households have nearly dominated the modern world. The second notable evolution is that the structure of a nuclear family now can consist of more than one breadwinner and there is a role exchange between folks. For example, instead of being a single-earner family with a spouse staying at home being the housewife, both partners can pursue their careers to support their family financially and share household chores and child-rearing.
Simultaneously, the positiveness of these changes can be attributed to a host of reasons. Firstly, as extended families are replaced by conjugal ones, family size shrinks. The smaller the family size is, the more sense of privacy, freedom, and respect individuals gain. Although conflicts between family members are inevitable, respecting others would make tackling the dispute more feasible Besides, the finance of the family would be more stable thanks to sharing the financial duties between spouses. From another angle, this may serve as a deterrent to domestic violence and gender inequality as women have more opportunities to devote to their occupation, attain higher social status, and the right to economic management control the finance of the family.
In conclusion, I truly believe the changes occurring to a family’s hierarchy and members’ responsibilities, specifically the shrink in family size and shared financial burden among family members, are a constructive contribution to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all schoolchildren 89
- Some people think that parents have a great influence on their children Others believe that the media is a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make tackling the dispute more feasible Besides, the finance of the family would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 965.302439024 178% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70764119601 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12032832008 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 106.607317073 175% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621262458472 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 283.868780488 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3258437063 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.153846154 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223320384529 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827771592035 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720821297896 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145544852164 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651266599363 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 40.7170731707 268% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.