Many people believe that students in remote areas should be given bonus points in the national graduation exam. Others believe that no one should be given that advantage. Discuss both points and give your opinion?
Regarding the national graduation exam, a matter of intense debate has arisen as contestants from remote areas are given high bonus points, which have raised consideration objctio from those who do not receive such a privilege. While advocates of this policy belive in its positive influences on rural students, others, including me, strong protest against th decision, for its disadvantages might outweight the expected benefits.
On the one hand, supporters of the policity of extra points base their opinion on the justification that bonus points might provide competitors from underprivileged conditions with more opportunities to pursue further education. It is undeniable that students from far-flung regions often suffer from financial problems and a lack of learning facilities as well as reference resources. Hence, receiving extra points would help them compensate for the hardships they have endured, briding the gap between the rich and the poor.
On the other hand, the policy can obstruct urban contestants from reaching their goals. The scheme for bonus points is likely to build injustice within the national graduation exam. Extra points may help remote students to enroll successfully in colleges, surpassing urban contestants who are much more superior in terms of academic and intelectually ability. In addition, refusal to grant metropolitants students bonus points is highly prejudiced. There are certainly a great number of students living in big cities who suffer from poverty and academic handicaps but are ineligible for supporting points. Therefore, this might contradict the policy’s sole purpose of providing fairness and equality for all applicants. What’s more, the policy of giving extra points to students from far-flung regions would place them under heavy misconceptions that admission to a prestigious university can be achieved just with little preparation. As a consequence, they will neglect their studies and easily be lured by entertainment factors, ending up ruining their own future door.
To conclude, though there are advantages resulting from the bonus point scheme, its outdone drawbacks suggest that the policy would need further revision to foster a more equitale and academically competitive environment in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 95 | view |
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 73
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...blems and a lack of learning facilities as well as reference resources. Hence, rec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66081871345 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95138035684 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0602084718 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199246000929 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691026903312 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550812456046 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11121911703 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036257401766 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.