Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever-growing population or to develop business and boost economies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
It is clear that the urban population is increasing at a noticeable speed, and the citizens’ requests might be pressure by social resources. Even though many people value their public parks, others suggest that it is better to replace parks with business or residential areas to meet their growing demand for land. I find this point of view very dissatisfactory.
Firstly, green places play a significant role in sustaining and improving people’s health. Before anything else, trees and plants in parks can absorb carbon dioxide and other chemicals, as well as provide us oxygen which helps to improve that area’s air condition. This improvement can be essential to people who have breathing problems due to air pollution. Another reason to maintain public parks is that many people can keep fit by doing exercises or doing public sports like badminton or football there. Daily exercises make a person healthier by improving their circulatory and immune system, building a stronger body plus protecting them from illness.
Secondly, cities which have parks and gardens look more appealing than those which don’t. If a city had only skyscrapers, industrial areas, and housing estate, it would be pretty boring and dull; therefore, the greens and flowers can make the city brighter and more colorful, thus bringing people closer to nature.
Finally, changing parks into business and residential places is not an effective solution to the yearly expanding population. Instead, the government should build more satellite centers outside of crowding urban areas. This would not only solve the high rate of jobless workers but also decreased air pollution caused by traffic in cities.
In conclusion, I believe that public parks benefit both the citizens and the panoramic view of the city, and there are alternative solutions to deal with growing needs for land use, such as building more suburbs or suburban centers.
- task 2 Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 80
- Film is a less important form of art than literature and painting To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Is it good for children to start using computers from an early age and spend long hours on them Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 61
- In recent years many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places such as bars restaurants and offices To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places 61
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe government should be in charge of this while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33660130719 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65288030885 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660130718954 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.880061048 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278541371704 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810273539024 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881604133143 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14396992462 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100040996879 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.