The figures below show the changes in the number of graduates in the UK and percentages of 5 groups of graduates working in different fields from 1992 to 2002.
The line graph and the column chart illustrate the changes and differences in the number of graduate students in the UK and the proportions of five career groups of graduates over a decade between 1992 to 2002. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that graduates in 1997 dominated the number of others over the period. Besides, there were downward trends in Professional, Management, and other fields, except for Secretarial, Sales that bucked the trend.
In particular, when it comes to the number of graduates, there was a slight decrease of 10,000 to 170,000 people in 2002 after sharply growing from 165,000 people in the beginning of the period to a peak of 180,000 people in 2002.
Additionally, concerning Professional and Management, the percentages of these aspects stood at 30%, 20% in 1992, then gradually declined to 20%, 15% in 2002 respectively. In stark contrast, in terms of Management and Sales, it demonstrates the opposite trend, the graph witnessed a considerable rise from 15%, 22% to 25%, 28% in 2002 accordingly.
Regarding Others, the figure fluctuated during the period, standing at 14% in 1993, then it culminated at 15% in 1997, followed by a fall of 3% in 2002, which constantly accounted for the lowest percentages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 61
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 100
- A lot of young people do not know how to manage their money when graduating from high school What do you think are the reasons What can be done to teach them this important skill 67
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children at a later age than in the past What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 89
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, regarding, then, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06763285024 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9617742487 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613526570048 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0922509154 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.857142857 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268989669967 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113478690986 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114882953551 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129916305154 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981073120532 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.