Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
There are some controversial ideas heating a debate over the language used. It is argued that scientists reckon people in the future will communicate with each other by one mother tongue. Obviously, this phenomenon has pros and cons, yet I believe one language might do more harm to community.
For this day of age, developing a uniform language can acts a precursor for prospering economic nations. with the revolution of industry, everything is currently exchanged among distinct countries, hence the only obstacle preventing companies from developing is communication barrier. by having the same language, enterprises are able to associate with foreign companies, which open avenues to more business opportunities. Simultaneously, this can assist the growth of nations.
Although this redeeming feature is widely acknowledged, the downsides of this problem still linger. Without the shadow of doubt, the same tongue can lead to the diversity of culture on the brink of collapse. Since mother tongue is the quintessence of a culture and the characteristic of a custom, permeation of an international language might exert the loss of the countries’ tradition. For example, in Vietnam young generations adopting English language as well as British culture lack of the knowledge about the custom and historical story. Furthermore, one language also accelerates the rate of unemployment. Some jobs involved language such as interpreter is unnecessary because people can comprehend the reference from faraway land. As the result, people who working in that field will be redundant.
In conclusion, although universal language can have tremendous benefit for the growth of countries, it is indisputable that it will negatively impact on the existence of many cultures and cause some social issue like employment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 73
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefit is in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
... age, developing a uniform language can acts a precursor for prospering economic nat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...cursor for prospering economic nations. with the revolution of industry, everything ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...om developing is communication barrier. by having the same language, enterprises a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14455975775 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620938628159 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2255109966 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212651496062 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619049041643 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326814885473 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12345759706 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254172163637 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.