In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today?

Nowadays, the emission of gases is one of the big issues around the world which deteriorates our nature, such as animals’ habitats and the ozone layer. Of these problems, car emissions greatly contribute to global warming, which will devastate the ozone layer and biodiversity in the future. However, a car is necessary in this era because a large number of people use cars in order to prevent crowded trains, and it is easy to go to a certain place. Therefore, decreasing cars in our society is impossible in twenty years. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, a car makes our lives more convenient and it is necessary for our lives without driving a car. Because many people nowadays use their cars every day to go to work or for fun. To give my example, last year, I traveled to Japan’s islands, which are far from Tokyo and there is no train. Therefore, we had to rent a car for four days. If I had a driver's license, my trip would be boring, I assert. Tokyo has a large number of stations and we can ride trains at a precise time. When it comes to going somewhere where it is not convenient in terms of moving, we need to drive a long way.

Secondly, electric cars are the most viable solution to reduce the large amount of harmful gases that humans emit every day. Many companies sell electric cars, but it is still not propagated because charging space is limited in most towns. If this space is constructed, we will buy electric cars because they are cheaper than ones that use gasoline and are environmentally friendly. However, constructing enough charging space in twenty years is difficult even today. Hence, there are many environmental problems and we need to prioritize these issues. Therefore, setting up a charging site takes more than twenty years.

On final note, when it comes to going to a certain place, we need a car or a means of travel. Without a car, we can not enjoy ourselves if there is no transportation except for cars. In addition, electric cars have been focused on by many people, but it takes a large amount of time and the cost is tremendous, hence many people use trains or buses. Therefore, I do not think we will be able to reduce cars in our society in twenty years.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-07-14	Astha101	70	view
2023-07-14	Astha101	66	view
2023-06-23	YasamanEsml	76	view
2023-04-13	sonyeoso	76	view
2023-04-08	prakriti malla	73	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user WatermelonUCLA :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a car is necessary in this era because a large number of people use cars in order to prevent cro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ip would be boring, I assert. Tokyo has a large number of stations and we can ride trains at a pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, except for, i feel, in addition, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57946210269 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58249511715 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511002444988 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5491364093 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1363636364 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285063951044 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784611745438 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649358428375 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173992985078 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343608517052 0.0645574589148 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.