The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese, Arabic, Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information on the number of people in Australia who speak Chinese, Arabic, Italian, or Greek as their first native language from the year of 1986 to 2011.
Overall, the numbers of people who spoke Chinese and Arabic continued to rise, while the other group consisting of Italian and Greek speakers dropped over the years.
The community who used Chinese and Arabic as their mother tongue increased through the times. In 1986, only about 120,000 people spoke Chinese. But in 2011, the numbers had been through a considerable upward trend and reached about 350,000 people. The situation also occurred with the Arabic native speakers. Specifically, the community had risen from 50,000 people in 1986 to 150,000 people in 2011.
In the meantime, the speakers of two European languages rapidly fell after 1986. The native Greek speakers dramatically dropped from about 240,000 to about 180,000 people within 25 years. People who used Italian as their mother tongue also went through reduction. The period from 1986 to 2004 saw a fall from 150,000 to 120,000 people in the Italian native speaking community. Although the number steadily stayed at 120,000 people until 2011, Italian still remained at the bottom position compared to the other 3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | Phamquynhchi1918@gmail.com | 100 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 77 | view |
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 80
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19024390244 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35228191765 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7568058618 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276123176991 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116584015454 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964363540678 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199766278933 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539111664341 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.