The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20-30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed.
The bar chart gives information about the motivation to succeed based on a young professionals group from 20 to 30 years old.
Looking from an overall perspective, personal satisfaction and ambition were two primary factors for those people to pursue success. Other factors reached more than 20%.
As the chart portrays, 80% of those sampled were motivated by personal satisfaction or ambition, while 70% cited family pressure as their incentive. The figure for pressure from society contributed remarkably to 60%. It is noticing that there was a similar level of people were pushed to succeed by rivalry or desire for material things at 50% each reason.
On the other hand, about 45% of those people's encouragement was money, followed by peer pressure at 1-2% lower. The top two lowest proportions were associated with fear of failure and envy at 25% and 30%, respectively. In addition, the percentage of surveyed who were motivated to achieve by feeling inadequate took a significant ratio of 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | beauty flowers | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | beauty flowers | 80 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | mahsa1989 | 91 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 84
- The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16564417178 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86590415082 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687116564417 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2077891643 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254258154905 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982013977302 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10809322967 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168623503038 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12218519527 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.