The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram delineates the process by which plastic bottles can be reused in the manufacturing of clothing. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there are 3 main stages to this entirely man-made process firstly involving the collection and sorting of bottles, followed by cleaning and processing, and finally the actual production of clothes.
In the first step, plastic bottles of varying sizes are collected and transported to factories. In the factories, the bottles are then sorted and placed in a machine to cut them into smaller pieces. The pieces must then be washed and left in the sun to dry.
The transformative stages begin with boiling of the pieces of plastic which precedes straining. After having been strained, the resulting byproduct becomes yarn which is then ready to be weaved into a fabric. Lastly, the finished rolls of material are used in the fabrication of clothing
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The bar graph below illustrates the statistics of imprisonment in five different countries from 1930 to 1980 78
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant write at least 150 words 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, lastly, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80127748635 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.3672371712 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129918446562 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536936894707 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482234480628 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824393800134 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459292176803 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, lastly, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80127748635 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.3672371712 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129918446562 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536936894707 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482234480628 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824393800134 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459292176803 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.