The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two charts illustrate the amount of money gained from the turnover of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas between 1999 and 2004 in five different European nations.
Overall, the UK earned the highest money in both coffee and banana. The sales of coffee and bananas increased except for the figure of bananas in Sweden and Denmark between two years.
Looking at the coffee’s sales, Sweden earned the highest money from selling coffee, followed by Denmark and UK with 3 million, 1.8 million, and 1.5 million respectively. The lowest figure was recorded in Sweden, at 0.8 million. After five years, the UK became the biggest sale, reached 20 million. The other climbed around 0.2 or 3 million.
Turning to banana’s sales, the UK always rank top in both years, which is increased threefold from 15 million to 47 million. Switzerland and Denmark were seen the experience a growth in its sales to 5.4 and 4 respectively. The opposite was true for Belgium and Sweden, which are fell around 1 million
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 73
- With students returning to schools coinciding with the beginning of the rainy season in central Vietnam people have suggested that it might be convenient to continue studying online until the rainy season has finished Discuss the advantages and disadvanta 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
- Task 2 Some believe that because everyone needs a place to live governments should provide houses for those who are too poor to afford their own To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other climbed around 0.2 or 3 million. Turning to banana’s sales, the UK always...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68773564595 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0046509113 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17856541379 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768349730909 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933239026662 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144731066546 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111500933332 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.