Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree?
In the present time, literature plays a vital role in a child’s life. Some say that it is very important to teach about local literature in schools than other from other nations. This essay will discuss why they believe this statement and why I disagree with them.
There are many positive impacts are available for people who agreed with the given statement. To comments with, if children learn their own mother tongue language in their schools, they will pass these languages and all written work to generation to generation, this may lead to positive impacts on saving languages from the extinction. China, for example, to save their ancient speaking languages, introduced all languages that must be teaching in all schools in 2010, this resulted in 2020, over 45 languages were out of danger from extinction. Hence, these profs prove that teaching own familiar languages in schools have many advantages, children fluently apply in their lives as well.
On the other side, when learners learn about western literature in their learning places, colleges, they become more knowledgeable of many languages, when they travel overseas, this may help them to cope with language boundaries. For instance, over 95% of students from Gujarati speaking families who learned English in their academic years, found it very flexible to use in other nations while they went for studying. Although this may lead to many native languages in fear of vanishing, but it has more advantages for everyone, this may lead to making them aware of other amazing cultures.
In conclusion, teaching native speaking languages in schools than other foreign ones leads to saving valuable language from vanishing. However, learning more foreign languages are better for many people nowadays, they can cope with language barriers while they are in another country. In my words, learning languages from other cultures has more advantages for pupils even though it is one of the reasons for the extinction of native literature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | levanhoan123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | deep Shikha | 92 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Nowadays it is easy to apply for and be given a credit card However some people experience problems when they are not able to pay the debt back 56
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cites Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to generation'.
Suggestion: to generation
...ss these languages and all written work to generation to generation, this may lead to positive impacts on s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23291925466 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55417932575 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5761212026 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183932092684 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788005717929 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548217074457 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126775932823 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500964720196 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.