Some children find learning history at school very exciting, while but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children.
People have different views whether the school pupils enjoy study history subject or not. Some believe that the school children consider that this is interesting subject, however, other believe that learning about history is tedious. In my opinion, methods such as adopting technology tools and field trip can be used to increase the pupils’ interest on history.
Technological devices can be a helpful teaching tools to teach the children about history. Products of tenology such as videos or movies are able to give the school children more detailed explanation about history. Encyclopedia videos, for instance, bring a great help for the school children in comprehending a certain historical period. Not only these videos are able to provide a clear naration of historical events, but also provide visual views. Thus, the pupils can increase their undestanding as well as enjoying the pictures in the videos. As a result, history may not consider as uninteresting since it provides different learning experience.
Another way which can be used to increase school children interest in history subject is by providing school trips to historical places. The Majority of school teachers deliver information about history using textbooks or slides. This traditional teaching method will not give the youngsters a deep understanding about the topic because the children can only imagine about the condition or situation about the past event resulting in less interesting on it. However, if the schools provide field trips to the related location, the pupils will see historical objects such as artifacts and relics which give them proofs about the period of the past and this may raise their curiosity about it.
Although there are many people think history subject uninteresting, employing technological devices and using a different teaching method can raise children’s interest on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 73
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food Other people believe that education will not work Discuss both opi 73
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting while but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 61
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situations How to solve it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 965.302439024 166% => OK
No of words: 294.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45578231293 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78319431177 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6812380546 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265040711194 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108957968541 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774274913815 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182729789767 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209158403749 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.