The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015.
The provided line graph depicts the number of people visiting four international museums including Hermitage, Egyptian Museum, Tokyo National Museum and National Museum of Anthropology from 1980 to 2015.
Generally, in the period of 35 years while the figure of Tokyo National Museum experienced a stable increase, that of the other notably fluctuated. Besides, Egyptian and Tokyo National Museum received more visitors than National Museum of Anthropology and Hermitage.
As the chart is concerned, from 1980 to 2000, four categories underwent an unstable period, except for Tokyo National Museum, which always accelerated steadily (from over 4000 to nearly 8000 visitors). For the first 5 years, Egyptian Museum, Hermitage and National Museum of Anthropology witnessed three distinctive trends, which are marginal rise, gradual decline and stability, respectively. Nonetheless, for the next ten years only National Museum of Anthropology showed an abrupt decrease (by about half of its figures in 1985), while the other two remained their trend. In contrast, in the period from 1995 to 2000 Egyptian Museum was the only one to change its tendency (diminished to about 8000 visitors). 2000 and the remaining years saw a steady trend in the number of four museums. Whereas National Museum of Anthropology had a slight fall, the others escalated, especially Tokyo National Museum, which experienced the highest climb (from 7000 to nearly 1000000)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | M10 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | kevann | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | quaan_ne | 78 | view |
- Parents should not pressure their children to choose a particular profession Young people should have the freedom to choose a career path they like To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, nonetheless, whereas, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54298642534 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79078061119 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7802606301 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.111111111 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255844602622 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115071911441 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100658936044 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216014461868 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122034038218 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.