The diagram below shows changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25-year period from 1980 to 2005.
Given are pictures comparing a town called Youngsville in New Zealand before and after experiencing changes over the 1980 - 2005 period.
As can be seen, the town underwent significant changes which mainly turned a rural landscape into an urban area.
One noticeable alteration was that the majority of trees were removed, making the town less green than before. Specifically, the woodland near the airport in the south of the town was replaced by the industrial area, with a warehouse being surrounded by factories. To the north of Alanah river, the trees were cut to make room for the park next to the hospital, and create a spacious area where residents could engage in more diverse activities.
Another dramatic development was as to the residential estate. On the north side of the river, the former residential area was demolished to make way for the stadium with two parking areas, while on the other side, the estate was removed for the erection of skyscrapers near the railway. The marina was also constructed near the railway station.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | vivitoben | 93 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | priyabhayani | 78 | view |
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 84
- The diagram below shows changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 93
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02873563218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69139824065 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1195585449 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902368708022 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460930846071 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110130854265 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921861692142 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141451282161 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.