Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern learning environments, students can select specific subjects to advance their personal study. Many people hold a view that food science and its preparation should be part of the school curriculum, whereas others and I think other key subjects should be more prioritized.
On the one hand, a certain amount of insightful knowledge into food making can exert many benefits for its learners in terms of improved well-being. It is a fact that many non-toxic ingredients might turn out to be detrimental to people’s health if being cooked in a mixture. For example, in high-temperature conditions, substances in various foods might react and then transform into poisons causing fatal consequences within minutes of ingestion such as botulism or leading to chronic diseases like blood clots. Teaching food science and food processing may help in those cases, so they should be put into the subject plan so as to equip students with necessary knowledge for potential health risk avoidance.
On the other hand, other people and I are of the opinion that schools should teach students more important academic disciplines, particularly liberal and social sciences for the sake of their future. Firstly, the youth can acquire a wide range of skills which can be favorable for upper learning. Most prestigious universities accept students according to both high school academic results and on merits. Secondly, students would be likely to secure a good job at the workplace after graduation. Having a profound knowledge plus practical skills, they can easily attain a high-ranked position with a lucrative salary in a renowned company. Therefore, it is crucially important to place pragmatic subjects at the top priority for a solid foundation for learners’ future prospect.
In summary, despite the sensible suggestion for food science integration, it is more vital the core subjects be focused because of positive career prospect later. Where possible I think the subject of food science ought to be synthesized into the school syllabus as an extra activity.
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Topic People continue to recommit crimes even after being penalized for their wrongdoings Why do you think this happens How can crime be stopped 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion KHANH HOMEWORK JUNE 12 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...d science and its preparation should be part of the school curriculum, whereas other...
^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hey should be put into the subject plan so as to equip students with necessary knowledge...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for example, i think, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32415902141 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89924063105 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614678899083 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0456506038 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265869099405 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901950568545 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917854812378 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181881056753 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865618228333 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.