For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that many believe that teachers are more influential in the development of children’s intellectual and social abilities, compared to parents. However, in my opinion, although teachers have certain impacts on this, it is the parents who play a bigger role.
To begin with, there are several reasons why parents can affect the growth of their children in terms of intelligence and social development. Firstly, the children's smartness may be affected by the way their parents choose what to be included in their diet. This is because, by an ingredients diet which is beneficial for their brain, children are more likely to grow up smarter. Secondly, how much their social skills improve also depends on their parent's character impact on them. For instance, if a child is able to live in a living environment where people around are very talkative and open-minded, they can totally become fluent people with better social skills in the future.
On the other hand, in my opinion, school teachers play a vital role in children's cleverness and improve their social skills. Additionally, school teachers are formally trained to help their own students develop intelligence using a modern approach. This means that due to constantly updating and providing new information and knowledge quickly, they can gain more various skills through practice in some competitions or events which organized by the school. As a result, they can be significantly improved with several useful skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, or social skills, like communication and teamwork. Furthermore, these days, there are a lot of families that not only have parents always busy working, but also lack teaching experience and methodology. This can leads to parents find it difficult to boost children's intelligence or abilities as effectively as the teachers
In conclusion, despite these kinds of impacts of teachers, what can define how intelligent and how good at social skills a child can be is their own parents. However, I personally believe that it is necessary for both of them to join hands for the purpose of the growth of children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational social and commercial pressure What are the reasons for this What is a solution to reduce the pressure 73
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in particular country who participate in sports compares with the percentage of people who watch them in 2000 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ng experience and methodology. This can leads to parents find it difficult to boost c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by the way, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1936416185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85297009052 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6038449846 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390452748516 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143087590887 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825463158889 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232694054701 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718082350182 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.