Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been a debate revolving around whether decisions should solely be made by the leaders of the company, or workers should also be allowed to take part in this important process. In this essay, both sides of the argument will be elucidated before drawing out any further conclusion.
On the one hand, it is understandable in regards to the monopoly of employers upon making a fundamental decision for the sake of the company. To specify, some problems require high levels of experience, or advanced knowledge so as to be profoundly solved. By virtue of such requirements, it is highly probable that only those who are professionals, or are veterans in the field, which, in this case, are the managers. They will have the adequate capabilities to make the right choice, especially if the decision made will have a large-scale effect on the company. To cite an example, if a company is in need of changing its counterparts, the leaders of the company should be the ones to take charge of the situation and draw a conclusion, since they have an in-depth knowledge about who they used to coorperate with, and who they may partner with in the future.
On the other hand, employees can be helpful for the decision-making process. As the saying goes “Two heads are better than one”, when involving more people in this procedure, the number of prospective measures may increase. This, in turn, can lead to more success, especially when the problem is related to employees. For example, if the bosses want to make alternations to the working environment, the workers will be cut out for giving a more precise solution since they are the ones who work at their office from nine to five. What is more, this will bolster teamwork, and may even promote a sense of democracy among people within the company as the workers feel welcomed to speak up.
In conclusion, whether decisions should be made by leaders or by all people at the workplace is still open to dispute. However, I am in favor of the view that workers should be involved in the process.
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 90
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answe 73
- The diagram shows the process of growing bananas for selling in supermarkets 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... On the one hand, it is understandable in regards to the monopoly of employers upon making a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ls of experience, or advanced knowledge so as to be profoundly solved. By virtue of such...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
..., it is highly probable that only those who are professionals, or are veterans in the f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80281690141 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76808976879 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3482248964 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252911050373 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951702715567 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807321027797 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17078704202 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481516323567 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.