In the past important knowledge of culture and history was stored in museum. Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum. To what extent do you agree or disagree?.
In the past, museums used to solely play the role of providing cultural and historical knowledge. However, as the world is becoming more digitally integrated, and with the invention of the Internet, giving humans a plethora of free information, museums have partly been considered as redundant. From my perspective, I am not in favor of this opinion for a number of reasons, which will be further elucidated in this essay.
To commence with, the necessity of museums is heightened regarding its emotional values. To cite an example, when people, especially the elderly and veterans, come to a historical museum and see worn-out clothes of the soldiers, and the damaged weapons during wartime in person, they can feel a sense of nostalgia. These individuals can take a stroll down the memory lane and vicariously go through the heyday they used to live in, again. In addition, younger generations can absorb a goldmine of historical and cultural knowledge by listening to the tour guides, helping them to immerse themselves into the world of the older eras. On the contrary, the Internet might not be able to deliver to those people such strong feelings, regardless of its ability to provide people with a reservoir of knowledge.
Another major factor contributing to the necessity of preserving museums is courtesy of the knowledge they can bring to foreigners. As can be seen in many cosmopolitan cities, not only museums are destinations of education for people within the nation but they are also of paramount importance when it comes to educating people from other countries at large. People of different backgrounds can come here to gain extra knowledge or another perspective into history. This, in turn, can enrich their common sense about the world and embrace the formative eras. Unlike the Internet which may be biased and slanted regarding some untrustable sources or websites.
In conclusion, although society has become more computerized, and the Internet has made it easier to get access to free information, museums remain vital for emotional and educational facets. All things considered, I am of the opinion that museums should be kept for future generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19830028329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88353543784 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589235127479 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1561683707 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157469113081 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547379276671 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387169513242 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103997164465 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232778077149 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.