Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, wealth has become a more debatable topic in the world. Whereas some say that it is the most important thing for a rich person is to help others, I will argue both sides of the statement and why I disagree with people.
Those who think that wealthy people need to help others have their justifications. Firstly, if billionaires and millionaires start to provide funding via their trust to poorer ones, so they become more educated and have more chances of higher-paying jobs. It will decline the poverty rate and unemployment number. Many rich citizens in China, for example, provide the scholarship to incredible students via their founded charity houses, as a result, many poorer learners to have financial support for higher studies and budling a carrier. Hence, the more rich personalities help other ones, the more numbers of poor and unemployed people decrease.
On the other hand, I have my views on this statement. When rich people spend their earnings to create a better life for poorer people, they will face many financial obstacles in running their businesses. It will not help them to make more investments in technologies, which will help in the later years and to avoid natural disasters. More money spending helps others, which decreases the fundings in solving problems like climate change, space explorations, the rising level of the sea, and many more. This led to results not only on mankind but also on other living creates as well. Therefore, the more investments made in inventing new technologies rather than humans, the more the earth becomes safer for future generations.
In conclusion, although it reduces the poverty rate and unemployment ratio, it declines fundings for tackling huge problems. In my words, despite having several demerits for poorer citizens, it is very beneficial in building new technologies and fighting against dangerous natural problems in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | Yoldoshali | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | Nanddy | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | rajpatel90 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | mirsohails | 67 | view |
- The increased world demand for oil and gas has made it necessary for locating these sources in remote and untouched natural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging these natural areas 56
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75443073205 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3702564529 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.466666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164038801414 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605070628512 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822545490284 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106122941792 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746600044796 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.