The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration depicts the various steps in which clothes are manufactured using recycled plastic bottles.
Overall, it is clear that the production of clothes included four stages, beginning with collecting plastic bottles and ending with rolling and producing clothes for users.
To begin, plastic bottles are gathered and then are delivered to the factory with the aid of trucks. In the next step, they are cut into small plastic pieces in a specialized funnel-shaped shredding machine before being classified. Once sorted bottles are sanitized, they are dehydrated under prolonged exposure to the sun (within 10 hours) before being boiled to be melted down.
In terms of the process after boiling, the liquor substance is strained and made into yarn. This is followed by that the yarn is weaved into the desired fabric that is suitable for making clothes and finally is rolled into separated units before being manufactured into clothes.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-28 | tranhonghanh11 | 56 | view |
2021-10-28 | tranhonghanh11 | view |
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 89
- Many people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The graph shows current and predicted trends in the gaming industry 87
- Many people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 95
- the table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Autralia in 2010 2012 and 2014 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'woven'.
Suggestion: woven
...n. This is followed by that the yarn is weaved into the desired fabric that is suitabl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 1615.20841683 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 150.0 315.596192385 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 4.20363070211 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60366408484 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 176.041082164 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 506.74238477 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7233643951 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138078201135 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623895753007 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318303046298 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846075537665 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202705618776 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.