No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The field of human endeavours has been evolving from time immemorial. Experts in different fields have come together to collaborate and engage with each other to make what seems to be impossible to be possible. With the forgoing, I strongly agree that No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorpiorates knowledge and experience from outside that field. I will be supporting this with three major points.
Firstly, incorporating knowledge from other fields makes professionals in one field to network and collaborate with another. This makes it possible to achieve large scale breakthroughs. For instance, in the field of Medicine, if there has not been collaboration between Medical doctors and Electrical/Electronics Engineers, machines used for diagnosis would not have been possible. Because of the expertise domain of the doctors to know what is required to diagnose under the machine and also the knowledge of the Engineers to build machines, they are able to build a usable machine. This has made it possible for other professionals in other fields to collaborate and network with each other.
Secondly, incorporating knowledge from other fields make the experts in a field to be versatile and also know much about other fields. Infact, it has been discovered by studies that there are some professionals in a field that knows as much as more than half of what an expert in another field knows. For instance, a computer software programmer will be versatile in the field of accountancy if he or she has developed an accounting software before. The same software Engineer will also know about Real Estate, Insurance and also field of medicine if he has developed software applications that has been used in this fields. Incorporating knowledge from other domains has made it easier for Computer science field to advance.
Furthermore, incorporating knowledge from other fields also allow the experts to advance knowledge in other fields. For instance, a computer science major needs to have knowledge about Management and Finance such that he/she will be able to manage his/her finance well when he decides to setup a company. Incorporating other knowledge will also allow him/her to be a better manager without much stress.
I believe others might think it is not necessary to have knowledge in other domains as far as it does not add any value to the person but the advantages of incorporating knowledge from other areas is more than not having it. It also allows for Team bonding. It is of paramount importance to have knowledge in other fields so as to be regarded as a complete expert and you can never tell when the knowledge will be of great use to you or even it might be required to safe your life one day.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 66
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orting this with three major points. Firstly, incorporating knowledge from ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aborate and network with each other. Secondly, incorporating knowledge from o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ware applications that has been used in this fields. Incorporating knowledge from o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r Computer science field to advance. Furthermore, incorporating knowledge fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...ge his/her finance well when he decides to setup a company. Incorporating other knowledg...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...better manager without much stress. I believe others might think it is not n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...tance to have knowledge in other fields so as to be regarded as a complete expert and yo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04395604396 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94490240707 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430769230769 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9991964228 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26102688309 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102918050092 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995734924857 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171220853091 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616441052135 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.