The bar graph below shows the average housing costs in three different regions for two different areas. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph shows the average cost of housing in rural, urban and suburban areas in 2005 and 2015. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, the average housing cost for urban and suburban areas is higher than rural areas for 2005 and 2015. They rose significantly in all three regions in the period shown in the bar graph. However, the housing costs for all three areas were different for the entire period.
It can be observed from the bar graph a significant difference between the average housing cost in all three areas in 2005 and 2015. In 2005, the average housing cost for urban was around 150,000, and for suburban areas, it was around 100,000, whereas the lowest was 75,000 for rural areas. Thus, a difference of 75,000 existed between the cost of the urban area and rural area in 2005. But the difference in 2015 amounted to 175,000 in 2015, which was significantly greater than in 2005. Thus, the average housing cost in urban areas is rising at a much higher rate than in rural areas.
Housing costs rose for all three areas in 2005 and 2015. The average price for rural areas increased from 75,000 to 125,000. Average urban areas cost almost doubled, going from 150,000 to 300,000. Also, the average housing costs for suburban areas elevated from 100,000 to 275,000, virtually tripling in values.
- The charts below show what percentage of their daily intake of various nutrients the average person in the USA consumes in each meal and in snacks These nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the 67
- The bar graph below shows the average housing costs in three different regions for two different areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation s can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument The following is a letter to the editor o 60
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar graph below shows the average housing costs in three different regions for two different areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79295154185 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20394675082 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400881057269 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6145390297 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7142857143 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295445516551 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150298998756 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081636785195 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23635827049 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554460033366 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.