The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007.
The bar chart compares the proportion of British men and women working in various categories of occupation in 2007. The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, significant differences between the portion of men and women were seen in two jobs. While the teaching and therapy profession saw a number of female workers, males were interested in construction-related jobs the most.
With regard to females, the most popular occupation was teaching, with 90% of people working in this field being women. Therapists also gained a lot of attention from women, about 80% was accounted for. The numbers of executives in the other types were around 40% to 55%, with exception of construction, of which only 10% were female.
On the other hand, 90% of construction-job employees were men, along with scientists, which males held 60% of jobs. Although therapists were popular among women, it was different for men, where just under 20% was accounted for men. However, the least number of male employees was found in teaching, with only 10% represented.
- The expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 78
- The comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007 86
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 11
- the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99667635959 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0525414703 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109916283297 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432806482222 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384323722357 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727755849334 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303220603465 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.