Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?
It is an undoubted claim that the use of mobile phones has raised quite concerns everywhere. Recently, both traditional and modern cellphones are used frequently as means of communication whether from work or personal affairs. In my opinion, regarding positive and negative sides of the topic is necessary prior to leading to a plausible conclusion.
On one hand, using mobile phones to stay connected with others consists of a variety of drawbacks. For one thing, despite the drastic enhancements among the technology fields have triggered the trend of using mobile phones, there still exists technical barriers when talking. For instance, although the distance barrier is addressed, the lack of face-to-face interactions or bad network quality cause unpleasant experiences during phone calls or meetings. For another, phone calls can become one’s bother once received whenever individuals are on vacations or a break; resulting in profound repercussions on mental health.
On the other hand, only taking the aforementioned beliefs for granted is subjective. Though the technical aspect is not optimal, there are other auxiliaries to support people to experience better communications, such as social medias or high-tech implements. Either with webcams, fax machines, or smartphones, all facilities enable people of both the economy and business class to improve their appointments in certain schemes. Moreover, virtual meetings can be less time-consuming due to the dispensable need to travel, reducing the number of labors within businesses, owing to a convenient way to connect with colleagues; which not only save time but also boost the economy to a new extent.
Isn a nutshell, despite the negative effects that can run far and wide when using cell phones, there is still a broad spectrum of benefits that can elevate a higher quality of life, ranging from the support of social media and high-tech implements to having a more robust financial system.
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 67
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages for their study 78
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...riences during phone calls or meetings. For another, phone calls can become one’s b...
^^^
Line 6, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... having a more robust financial system.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, for instance, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46229508197 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9787674683 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0543928713 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221301836913 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681097057436 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432891002927 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122682427572 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475360845647 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.