traditional lifestyle of local people in developing countries is attracting and increasing the number of tourists to the countries which has the effect of preventing local people changing to modern ways to what extent do you agree or disagree
It is irrefutable fact that the increasing number of visitors, in developing countries are attracted by the traditional lifestyle of local individuals. It also has affect of preventing local people changing to modern ways. I agree with this aforementioned statement as well as articulate the reason behind this in the following paragraphs before conclusions.
To commence with, there are many reasons, why it is possible to increasing the number of tourists in developing countries? The first and foremost; incredible history, culture as well as background of the particular countries. On the other words, these elements are responsible to increase the number of tourist in countries because every nation has its own significance or importance, such as traditional buildings, neat and clean premises as well as metro trains also attract to the visitors. To epitome, research conducted by the Indian government that represent the outside of Amritsar city makes people life more convenient and easier. As a result, it also immensely beneficial for economic growth as well as it attract more tourist.
Further, strengthening to my viewpoint, why preventing to the local individuals changing to modern ways? Firstly, it could affect the new generation and youth because when the old buildings renovating and rebuilt then its value and importance could not same as compared to past and youngster forgetting their culture. For instance, museums as well as historical buildings rebuilt and renovating by people such as Sheesh Mahal and well as Tomb of Akbar. Hence, individuals and youth forgetting their real history due to technology as well as new creative innovations.
To recapitulate, I pen down and say history traditions as well as culture are most important elements to increasing number of tourists and government should also take steps to tackle with this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-15 | jasvirkr | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | sukhimeet kaur | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | sukhimeet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | gaurav2492 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 81 | view |
- in some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past do you think this is a positive or negative development The table chart show the percentage of women and men road in particular town bicycle in 2011 73
- The plans below show a public when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 67
- In some countries it can be difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs despite their experience what do you think are the causes of this problem and what the main measures could be taken to solve it 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who use the internet for different purposes in 2007 and 2009 51
- The graph below shows the development and rise in population in Chandigarh from 1935 to 1995 some people think that schools have to be more entertaining while other think that their role purpose is to educate which do you agree with use specific reasons a 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increase'?
Suggestion: increase
...are many reasons, why it is possible to increasing the number of tourists in developing co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, well, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42320819113 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05395344495 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5772466368 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296315145782 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112163375511 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114861726695 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182862442001 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116480276012 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.