Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions diverge on whether a country takes advantage of their students who study abroad. Although some fervently advocate this sentiment, I am at loggerheads owing to economic damages and brain drain.
Admittedly, there is a remarkable economic detriment for a country whose students are educated overseas. In this day and age, as well as tourism, education is considered a smokeless industry. This can be explained by the fact that international students, except for tuition expenditure, contribute to other local consumptions and become abundant part time labor resources to create a closed ecological system which redounds significantly to local economic development. Perceptibly, Singapore, Australia, The US-UK, for example, emerge as the ideal educated destinations, attracting millions of foreign students yearly and bringing back enormous benefits. Hence, countries whose students do not acquire the local education will simultaneously be deprived of a noticeable amount of money.
Further and even more prominently, brain drain, a haemorrhage of talent from the original home country, is another result of the move to abroad countries for education. Perceivably, most well- educated students after studying abroad have a bias towards living and working in the host countries where they will be offered highly remunerative salaries and myriad promotion opportunities. The brain drain leads to a disproportionate distribution of knowledge, promoting innovation and development in destination countries, while stripping ‘source’ countries of their best workers, and therefore hindering their progress. As a result, the more students studying abroad, the more qualified employees a country is supposed to lose.
By way of conclusion, from a country’s perspective, exporting individuals to foreign educational systems does more harm than good.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows how ketchup is made 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... local consumptions and become abundant part time labor resources to create a closed ecol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... brain drain leads to a disproportionate distribution of knowledge, promoting inn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, except for, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90706319703 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25920344528 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669144981413 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8782909093 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182698297759 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073108572636 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611559317367 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104226809787 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049730871998 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.