The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The change in four different meat consumption in a European nation from 1979 to 2004 is displayed by the line graph, shown in grams per individual weekly.
Overall, fish was the least consumed among other aforementioned various of meat. However, all figure experienced a downward trend, except the chicken, with some changes.
Initially, there had been the highest consumption of beef, with slightly more than 200 grams per person, followed by that of chicken and lamb sharing similar grams around 150 per individual. Nevertheless, the rest had accounted for approximately a third of the former, being the lowest.
Eventually, the amount of chicken meat eaten individually per seven days in that country increased by a hundred. Furthermore, the figure for lamb and beef witnessed a decrease to be close a half, respectively. When it came to the rest, it was the only one which moderately declined to be a fifth of the maximum data recorded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 61
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 84
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 78
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10322580645 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9376170909 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683870967742 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.102528399 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175239669141 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066625917784 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899805206408 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112691875032 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103787755821 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.