The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The given line graph give information about the proportion of travellers to England who came to four different place of interest in Brighton.
Overall, while the percentage of visiters in Pavilion and Pier saw an upward trend almost over 30 years, a slight decrease was seen in the figure of the others. Pavilion was the most famous destination in Brighton.
In 1980, at 23%, the proportion of tourists in Pavilion was more than double to Pier. There was a sighnificant rise in the percentage of travellier in Pavilion and peaked at under 50% in 1995, then declined to 30% in 2010. The figure of Pier saw a fluctuating increase to over 10% throughout the given period.
On the other hand, the opposite trend was true for the other places. In 1980, Festival was the most popular place in Brighton with 30%, then decreased approximately by 2% in 2010. Similarly, the year 1985 saw a dramatic growth in the proportion of visiters in Art Gallery and hit the highest point of 20%, then drop sharply less than 10% in 2010, which was its lowest point of the whole graph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68617021277 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59615339475 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7643391953 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171676599253 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698164634347 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926065197962 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127203225881 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114438991629 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.