The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given that investments on extraterritorial research develop numerous merits to society, many people believe that those money could better used if it is allocated to other fields. In my opinion, I am partly agree with this notion because although it enhances different aspects of people lives such as communication or environment, there are other global problems that should have been dealt with better with those disposals.
On the one hands, the capital used on outer space studies has improving human life much more than it seemed. Exploring the space play an important role in the progress of the world, leading to the advanced communication nowadays. For example, the Internet, a product that is heavily relied on the satellite to function. In addition, those research about space also has a great impact on other fields such as environment or agriculture. Satellites, another historical achievement in space industry, are providing images of wildfires and also information about the weather to service as weather forecast for farmers. Thus, many disasters in woodlands and losses in cultivating are avoided.
Whilst it is true that the investments in astronautic is beneficial for mankind, however poverty and world hunger are still wrenching the hapless people in third world countries. Thus, it seems that those flows of money should pour into the research on the solution for these issues. Education aid, health aid and provision aid are great examples of what the governments should invest in. Furthermore, while the advancement it gives us a closer look into the environment, it is hardly to say that problems like air or water pollution are being well taken care of.
In conclusion, researching about space is surely important and worth spent on, however the capital for those studies should be reduced and maybe used on dealing with other problems.
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 78
- to some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree what other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 78
- How can the government make sure that people save enough money to live on when they are old 78
- the graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 78
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...ts to society, many people believe that those money could better used if it is allocated to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ther fields. In my opinion, I am partly agree with this notion because although it en...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, third, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79769434654 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8803983315 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159932470399 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505866122005 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431340885749 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955380261022 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256581373015 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.