The two maps show the main changes which have taken place in the wotn of Castellon between the year 2000 and today.
The two maps show the main changes which have taken place in the town of Castellon between the year 2000 and today. In general, it appears that Catellon has become a much more morden city, with far more shopping and transport facilities. One interesting change is that a new tram line has been built, to connect the university with the town center. In 2000, there wasn't any accommodation for students, but a hall of residence has been built near the university. Another striking change is that the old market in the west of the city has been knocked down to make way for new shops. A completely new covered market has also been built on the other side of town. If we look at the port area, it has been pedestrianize since 2000, and a range of entertainment facilities have been built such as cinemas, bars and clubs. The north- east of the city used to be a green area, with lots of trees, but the trees have been cut down, and a new shopping complex has been constructed A final interesting development has been the introduction of a bike-rental scheme in the city centre.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | hankhinhduong | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 61
- The two maps show the main changes which have taken place in the wotn of Castellon between the year 2000 and today 78
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 78
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 89
- Some people think that there is a great influence of news media on people s lives and this is a negative development Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and relevant examples 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at of Others, with 15% and 13% in turn.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96208530806 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69349464667 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7232491571 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240742392896 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859334901501 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129384427527 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1530102699 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149916014129 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.