The graph shows the number of visitors to two museums in a country from 2000 to 2015.
The line graph illustrates how many people visited two museums in one country in a fifteen-year period, between 2000 and 2015.
From an overall perspective, what stands out from the graph is that this period witnessed considerable fluctuation. Another striking point to note is that in 2000, the number of visitors to the Natural Museum was higher than in History Museum, but in 2015, more visitors chose History Museum instead of another.
Looking at the details, as regards the Natural Museum, the figure for visiting started at 80,000, then it plunged in the next three years and reached over 20,000 visitors in 2003 after recovering to 70,000 in 2004. After that, the figure went down slightly, at which point it remained stable at 50,000 until 2008. In the next two years, the number of people who visited the Natural Museum shot up to a peak of 90,000. Then the figure declined dramatically, finishing at around 40,000 visitors in 2015.
By contrast, the number of History Museum’s visitors went in the opposite direction. Having started at 20,000, the figure then peaked at nearly 90,000 in 2003. The figure fell rapidly in 2004 before fluctuating between around 30,000 and over 40,000 in the period of seven years, from 2004 to 2010. 2011 saw a marginally rise to 50,000. Finally, there was a levelling off in the last 5 years.
- The graph shows the number of visitors to two museums in a country from 2000 to 2015 78
- The graph shows the number of visitors to two museums in a country from 2000 to 2015 56
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports lessons must be compulsory in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exper 61
- The maps below show changes that took place Youngsville in New Zealand over a 20 year period from the 1990 to 2010 84
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('marginally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...even years, from 2004 to 2010. 2011 saw a marginally rise to 50,000. Finally, there was a levelli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, then, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91629955947 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48501105419 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1649362935 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282629970457 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107667644008 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108953289475 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213177875095 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118833543085 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.