Chevalier's Memoir
Both the reading passage and lectures discusses about the memoir of Chevalier. Whilst the author suggests that the claims made in the memoir was bogus mentioning three different reasons, the challenges the proposition made by the author. In her opinion, the arguments in the memoir was extensively accurate, though not perfect, for several reasons which will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, begins by mentioning that although Chevalier affirmed his wealth was often used for gambling and parties, the evidences clearly showed Chevalier burrowed huge sum of money from the prevailing rich ones in Switzerland; however, the speaker refutes the position made by author stating that Chevalier was rich and to attain the sum of money, for parties and gambling, he had to sell the property which would take two to three days. So, when he ran out of money, during that waiting period, he might have taken the sum of money as stated. As you can see, it completely falsifies the authors claim.
The writer further asserts that there was a confusion between accuracy of the conversation between the Chevalier and Voltaire: exact conversations could not be remembered and replicated in the written form in memoir. The lecturer questions the particular argument maintaining that it was acknowledged that Chevalier used to keep notes of the conversation between him and Voltaire as per his remembering capacity during the nights. Further, she adds that there was enough evidence about Chevalier using notes and journals during the preparation of his memoir.
The reading article posits, finally, that statements mentioned about the Chevalier's escape from the prison was doubtful; it was more probable that he ran out of prison by bribing the jailers rather than using ceiling for the escape which would have made it interesting as compared to former one. As opposed to articles opinion, the lecturer argues that there were other numerous powerful prisoners in the jail, but they were unable to escape by bribing. On top of that, she says the evidence marked that the repair of the ceiling of the jail happened after Chevalier escaped from it. Had Chevalier not damaged ceiling for escaping, it would not have been necessary to repair it.
To summarize, the writer and speaker both holds opposite views on the authenticity of Chevalier memoir which will be difficult for them on finding the common ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | joyce05 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- People who develop many different skill are more successful than people who tend to focus on one skill only 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Protection of Forest Through International Fund 80
- Cure of Malaria 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much money on clothing to improve their appearance Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'article'.
Suggestion: article
...s compared to former one. As opposed to articles opinion, the lecturer argues that there...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not have been necessary to repair it. To summarize, the writer and speaker bot...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, then, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1373.03311258 149% => OK
No of words: 396.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16919191919 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62872238151 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517676767677 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6513392443 49.2860985944 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.214285714 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313849721541 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113840242533 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818183161634 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1809454318 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634371022249 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.