The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar graph illustrates the average number of years males and females attended school, while the pie chart highlights information about the various levels of education achieved by adults between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that there was an upward trend in the number of year for both man and woman who spent on instruction. However, the figure for males was slightly higher than the other over period. Additionally, the education ranks of mature people increased in 10 years.
Looking at the details, in 2000, man showed up at school for an average of about 9 years which rose noticeably to nearly 12 years in 2010. By contrast, the number of years woman went to school just 8 in 2000, but this figure remained stable until 2004 before marginally improved to aroung 9 in 10 years later.
Moreover, as regards the stages of education in pie chart, in 2000, 25,77% people finished primary school, yet this number significantly decreased to only 2,1% in 2010. Despite starting at 7,5% and 8,3%, 10 years witnessed a jump to 30,31% and 32,93% respecively in the percentage of citizens achievement in master and bachelor degrees. On the other hand, in 2010, 19,55% and 15,2% Singaporian completed highschool and secondary school in turn, althought these proportion in 2000 were dramatically higher.
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is tomake parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 75
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, second, while, as regards, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03125 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65828253569 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629464285714 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9636341398 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217935295945 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837762731762 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874950427325 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138664726512 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892373678154 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.