The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries.Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
The freedom of transporting products from one nation to others has sparked heated controversy worldwide. There is no doubt that this problem plays a vital role in developing the economy, while others are of the opinion that it will be native-ravaged industries. In this essay, I will elaborate on both of these views and share my personal opinion.
International free trade supporters hold the opinion that this deal is one of the fundamental elements in moving forward in the country's economy. To begin with, if our commercial goods are exported to an international market with a low tax or without taxation, it will be easy to promote some developing and powerful nations to purchase our local products such as traditional food, state-of-the-art electronic devices, and fashionable clothes. For example, Japan annually trades good-qualified products to the USA without any charge and that's why Blossom kingdom is one of the trustworthy and lasting partners of America. As a result, with cooperating of some powerful economic countries, it will be sure that the living conditions of residents will significantly rocket. Furthermore, it does not struggle to buy some foreign types of equipment at low prices. This can be attributed to the fact that both sides of each country want to continue their good relationship and reciprocity between them. In some nations, South Korea is a good example in that it is not effortless to be available for Covid vaccinations, so they can effortlessly import these from the US without the expensive cost.
On the other hand, some citizens are against it and strongly believe that it will take some industrial-related risks. Initially, the native company can not get enough strength to compete abroad. As long as an item with a wide range of up-to-date features, customers can easily be impressed with it and want to buy it rather than the traditional one. A good illustration of this is that in today's world, the human race over the world focuses on purchasing fashionable style clothes rather than a local one. This can lead to affecting a plethora of local industries which decrease their monthly income. In addition, the vast distances traveled by food, oil, and consumer goods are harming the environment and making our lives unsustainable. This can be explained by some overseas-country businesses do not care about our environment, they just mind how much profit they can gain. A typical example of this is that some industrial factories which are from China frequently waste CO2 emissions into the atmosphere of Vietnam, and it results in their air pollution issues which are more serious than in the past. This one inevitably had a detrimental effect on the nation's environment.
To summarize, although it is undeniable that there are some positive aspects to free global commerce, it is of paramount importance that the government and citizens need to be made aware of the potential negative sides involved. I firmly believe that strict rules should be observed to solve some bad influences of this trade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-17 | zarutopath | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | Gnaight | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | Sadia276 | 69 | view |
| 2018-02-06 | rutbah amin | 91 | view |
| 2018-01-17 | Sagarjango | 91 | view |
- Temperature and Daylight Hours 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts show below what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth while others claim that it damages local industries Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ate on both of these views and share my personal opinion. International free trade supporters h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ducts to the USA without any charge and thats why Blossom kingdom is one of the trust...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease their monthly income. In addition, the vast distances traveled by food, oil...
^^
Line 3, column 1161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...vitably had a detrimental effect on the nations environment. To summarize, although it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2554.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 500.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.108 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01840752716 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7491140631 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.619047619 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8095238095 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162526421914 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486527538835 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026125073557 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100232377095 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033537319114 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ate on both of these views and share my personal opinion. International free trade supporters h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ducts to the USA without any charge and thats why Blossom kingdom is one of the trust...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease their monthly income. In addition, the vast distances traveled by food, oil...
^^
Line 3, column 1161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...vitably had a detrimental effect on the nations environment. To summarize, although it...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2554.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 500.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.108 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01840752716 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7491140631 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.619047619 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8095238095 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162526421914 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486527538835 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026125073557 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100232377095 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033537319114 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.